Monday Morning Coffee – Paying off a 30-Year loan in 15 Years

Monday Morning Coffee

Paying off Your Mortage Early

Foreclosure Mess – Round 2

Foreclosure Mess

(Round 2)

The latest foreclosure crisis is creating situation that will have to result in major changes to the system and more than likely, billions of dollars of loses for banks.  I spent a lot of time reading up on it this weekend and here is the abbreviated version of what the issues are (as I currently understand them): (more…)

Monday Morning Coffee

Monday Morning Coffee

Importance of Title Insurance

Good morning,

I hope you had a great weekend.  Zach and I took our stab at clothes shopping.  Bought him some size 4 pants that looked a “little” large.  Once we got them home, I was informed that the correct size was “4T”.  Ah well, back to Target. 

Things are getting interesting with foreclosures as the number of banks with “issues” with their foreclosure process is growing.  In several states the Attorney General is stepping in and of course, politicians all over are jumping on the issue.  The timing of this is fortuitous if your goal is higher home prices because although demand has slumped after the tax credit,  if the banks have to delay foreclosures again for a couple of months to sort his out, it will keep inventory from growing too quickly and help prop up prices.  However, it does point out a very large concern all buyers should have, and that is Title Insurance. 

Typically, the seller’s agent picks a title company and it just happens that they have a friend selling the policy.  As a buyer, you need to make sure your agent is making sure you have a title policy from a company that is financially able to withstand the potential issues.  Espcially if you are purchasing a home that has recently been foreclosed on.  You do not want to have your ownership challenged only to find that the company insuring your purchase has gone out of business.  A few companies that are likely to survive any crisis would be Chicago Title, Fidelity Title and First American Title.   As a bare minimum, make sure they are publicly traded so you can look at their financial strength. (more…)

Updated Foreclosure Data

Updated Government Foreclosure Data

This week, the government released some updated foreclosure date from Q2.  These charts are re-prints from a blog I subscribe to called CalculatedRisk.   It can be found at www.CalculatedRiskBlog.com  I highly recommend it as the person who runs it does a pretty good job of assimilating different economic data.  Even if I don’t always like it, which brings me to the following charts:

Government Guaranteed and Owned Foreclosures

This first chart shows that Fannie, Freddie and FHA are now the proud owners of almost 250,000 homes (this is not all the foreclosures, just the ones taxpayers are on the hook directly for).  The number is increasing as banks are processing more foreclosures for people who just don’t qualify for a loan modification. 

This next chart taxes it a step farther and is really what caught my attention, it shows how many people are upside down on their mortgages.  This is important because if the economy were to go into another recession, these are people who have less incentive to hold onto their homes.  I look at it as the worst case, since anyone with positive equity would try to sell and avoid foreclosure. 

Almost one-third of homeowners are underwater

 The number are scary – 30.6% of homeowners under water and a total of almost $2.4B under water (this is just the portion of their loan in excess of the home value).  Also, these are first mortgages; more people are under water if you consider their second mortgages also.  But, it’s not all bad.  The next chart made me happy I don’t live in Nevada!

Negative Equity by State

Ouch.  California doesn’t look as bad as some of these other states.  And, for those of us in San Diego, we’re better off than most of California.

 Combining all three of these charts, it is evident that the housing recovery is tenuous at best.   Combined with the slowing pace of sales after the tax credit expiration I believe it is cause for concern.

Monday Morning Coffee – Quarterly Mortgage Report

Monday Morning Coffee

OCC and OTS Mortgage Metrics Report for Q1, 2010

Good morning,

I hope you had a great weekend.  Ours was a nice, quiet one with nothing remarkable – which seems in itself, remarkable. 

Every quarter, I have gone through the report from the Treasury department on the mortgage market called OCC and OTS Mortgage Metrics Report.  The report usually comes out about a quarter after the data it is reporting as it takes awhile to compile it.  I have to confess, that I received the report in early July, but did not look at it until last week.  I am not going to go into as much depth as I usually do because the report was mostly more of the same, but here are a few highlights and lowlights:

• Delinquency rates dropped during the first quarter on all loan types (Yea!)
• The number of foreclosures increased substantially (Boo!)
• Modifications and other retention actions also increased (Yea!)
• Re-default rates for modified mortgages remains high (over 50% are 60+ days late after 12 months) (Boo!)

The last detail I took out of the report has the potential to be good news.  Modifications done in the last 3 quarters have had a lower re-default rate than those done previously.  This is because lenders are working harder to create a significant difference in payments when loans are modified now than in the past.  However, the difference in the re-default rate gets less and less the farther out from the modification date.  In other words, it is possible, that the new modifications are only delaying the re-defaults and not eliminating them.  We won’t know for sure for another couple of quarters, but at least there’s a possibility the efforts might be succcessful.

We don’t have any new listings this week, but are working on a smaller detached home in 4S for next week.

That’s it, enjoy the Coffee!

This week, the Coffee is not a motiviational or inspirational story, I am venturing out on a limb.  I read something a couple of weeks ago that really made me angry.  I try and walk a fairly neutral political line as I have friends and family who are both on the far right and the far left.  I tend to sit in the camp that distrusts most politicians from all parties.  I definitely am in the group that doesn’t care for large political action commities or lobbies (yes, I am aware I am a Realtor and we have one of the strongest of all – that doesn’t mean I think it’s right).  This particular story is a prime example of one lobby putting its members above the children they are supposed to help.  It may be old news to many of you, but for the life of me, two weeks after first reading it, I still don’t get it.

The education debacle of the decade

By Bob Ewing | Published: 3:30 PM 07/06/2010

Dr. Patrick Wolf spoke to a packed audience in the Capitol Visitors Center last Monday.

The seats were full and people stood all along the edges of the room, even spilling out into the hallway.  We all came to hear him explain his latest research on the tiny education program that has caused a national uproar—arousing so much passion that African-American leaders from around the country recently gathered downtown to engage in an act of civil disobedience.

The Department of Education commissioned Wolf to conduct a series of detailed studies on the results of the Washington DC Opportunity Scholarship Program (OSP).  Established in 2004 as a five-year pilot program, OSP is among the most heavily researched federal education programs in history.

OSP targeted about 2,000 of the poorest kids in DC who were stuck in some of the worst schools in the country.  It gave their parents a $7,500 scholarship to attend a private school of their choice.

The response was immediate.  Four applications were filled out for every slot available.    Parents loved the program, considering it a lifeline for their children, a way to escape failing schools and enter safe, functional schools.

Everyone knew OSP would be a bargain.  DC has among the highest spending per pupil in the nation.  At a conservative estimate of $17,542, the public schools spend over $10,000 more per child than the $7,500 spent through the scholarship program.

But would OSP achieve measureable results?

The answer is a resounding yes.  Previous studies by Wolf showed an improvement in academic performance, to the point that a student participating in OSP from kindergarten through high school would likely be 2 ½ years ahead in reading.  The key finding in this final round of research, Wolf told us, was the graduation rates.   OSP dramatically increases prospects of high-school graduation.

Wolf pointed to research showing that high-school diplomas significantly improve the chance of getting a job.  And dropouts that do find employment earn about $8,500 less per year than their counterpoints with diplomas. Further, each graduate reduces the cost of crime by a stunning $112,000.  Cecelia Rouse, an economic advisor to President Obama, found that each additional high school graduate saves the country $260,000.

Simply put, OSP has a profoundly positive effect not just on students, but on the city and the country as a whole.

So when it came time for Congress to reauthorize OSP, it would seem to be a no-brainer:  Expand the program.

Instead, they killed it.

Buried deep inside a 1000+ page, half-trillion-dollar spending bill was a provision that prohibited any new students from entering the program.  To top it off, the 216 new students added to OSP for the new academic year were pulled out by Education Secretary Arne Duncan just before the school year started.

Why did this happen?  According to former DC Mayor Anthony Williams and former DC Councilman Kevin Chavous (both Democrats), the answer is politics at its worst.

Williams and Chavous co-authored an op-ed arguing that politicians opposing OSP “are largely fueled by special-interest groups that are more dedicated to the adults working in the education system than to making certain every child is properly educated.”

The editorial board of the Washington Post put it a little more bluntly:

It’s clear, though, from how the destruction of the [OSP] program is being orchestrated, that issues such as parents’ needs, student performance and program effectiveness don’t matter next to the political demands of teachers’ unions.

The Post board also wrote that “the debate unfolding on Capitol Hill isn’t about facts.  It’s about politics and the stranglehold the teachers unions have on the Democratic Party.”

As it turns out, the teachers unions are the single largest contributor to federally elected politicians, with the vast majority of their funds going to Democrats.  The teachers unions don’t like programs like OSP because when parents have the freedom to choose, they may choose schools that don’t have unionized teachers.

DC Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton was one of the principal opponents of OSP and was instrumental in ending the program.   Guess who her largest donor is?  (American Federation of Teachers.)

The three main critiques of OSP are that it takes money away from the public schools, is not accountable and does not provide a cure-all solution to improving education.  None of these critiques has merit.

First, OSP takes no money away from public schools.  By stark contrast, it pumps millions of dollars into the public schools. OSP is funded with new federal money as part of a plan that allocates matching funding directly to the public schools.  So for every dollar that goes to OSP, the public schools get an extra dollar.

Plus, the public schools get to keep all the money saved through OSP.  This means that in addition to the matching funds, the public schools receive over $10,000 for every child in OSP—children that the public schools do not have to educate.  Also worth noting, the Education Secretary has a $159 billion budget with billions going to education programs that are unproven.

Second, OSP is truly accountable.  Parents care about the welfare of their individual children more than any politician or bureaucrat. The parents are overjoyed with the program, unlike their prior dissatisfaction with the DC public schools they are desperate to escape.

Third, DC kids need help right now and OSP provides it.  Systemic reform takes time, and while we all should support and applaud recent efforts to reform the public schools, it will be years before they perform as well as the private schools that the OSP students attend, if they ever do.  That is, children in school today need help today.  They cannot wait for years or decades for reform to hopefully come.  

To his credit, Education Secretary Arne Duncan acknowledged that the OSP students are “safe and learning and doing well.” He argued, “We can’t be satisfied with saving 1 or 2 percent of children and letting 98 or 99 percent down.”
The obvious answer would seem to be to expand OSP and “save” more kids, not shut it down and force 100 percent of DC students to be “let down.”

When Congress killed OSP, there was a national backlash.  Editorials in papers across the country denounced the decision.  Thousands of kids from several states rallied on Capitol Hill to save the program.  Black leaders gathered in an act of civil disobedience before the front doors of the Department of Education.  They pointed out that just about half of African-American and Latino students are graduating from high school today and the OSP students are almost completely African-American and Latino.

Even the DC public-school chancellor supported OSP and told Congress that the public schools would likely not be able to reabsorb the students and give them the same quality education.  The DC City Council went so far as to petition Arne Duncan to reverse his decision.

Duncan understands the importance of school choice.  He famously said that “my family has given up so much so that I could have the opportunity to serve; I didn’t want to try to save the country’s children and our educational system and jeopardize my own children’s education.”  So he chose to send his kids to public schools in Virginia rather than DC.

In fact, 38 percent of Congress chooses to send their kids to private schools.  That’s four times the national average.  A vote in the Senate to save OSP was defeated 58-39.  If only the Senators who exercise school choice themselves had voted in favor of OSP, the program would have been saved.

And so OSP will end.  Thankfully, the students currently enrolled will be able to continue through to graduation.  But with no new students allowed in the program, it will die through attrition.

I’ve had the pleasure of working with the OSP parents and kids for the last four years. And I’ve come to know many of them personally, and experience firsthand their reaction to the heartbreaking news.

Latasha Bennett’s son, for example, attends an excellent school on a scholarship and he’s doing great.  Her daughter was going to attend  kindergarten at the same school, thanks to OSP.  And then Latasha got the letter from Arne Duncan stating that her daughter was being forced to leave the program.  Her son was safe, but her daughter was one of the 216.  Latasha cannot afford the school’s tuition and the charter schools were all filled up by the time Duncan’s rejection letter showed up.  So her daughter had no option but to attend the local public school, which has two-thirds of its students failing to meet basic benchmarks in math and reading.

In fact, 90 percent of the 216 kids shut out of OSP were reassigned to failing public schools.

It’s too late to save OSP.  But thankfully, elsewhere the tide is turning.  Two weeks ago a bi-partisan school choice bill was signed into law in Louisiana.  It comes on the heels of a similar program in Oklahoma and is the nation’s 20th school choice program.

People will continue to have intelligent and respectful debates about school choice and education reform.  And whether we are liberal, conservative, libertarian or independent, we can all agree that special interest groups should not be able to force politicians to kill cost-effective programs that work.

It boils down to this:  Parents deserve the freedom to choose the schools that best meet their needs.  And every child, regardless of background, deserves a quality education.  We should not dash their hopes and their futures to appease the politically powerful.

________________________

I wish I could send you in a direction to protest or that I had a great plan.  But, I am dumbfounded.  I don’t get it.  A teachers’ union did this to kids?  Maybe there’s another side to this story, but after 2 weeks, I have not seen it.

Have a great week,

Scott

Treasury Department Foreclosure Report

Foreclosure and Mortgage Deliquencies

Q4 2009

I finally finished the OCC and OTS Mmortgage Metrics Report for the fourth quarter of 2009 (I know you’re jealous at how much fun I get to have).   The report looks at all first liens held by most of the largest mortgage servicers.  It covers almost 34 million loans totaling almost $6 trillion.  It is the raw data before it gets spun by the press or politicians.  Here are some highlights and lowlights from the report:

Delinquent Mortgages

• Mortgage performance declined for the seventh consecutive quarter.  Delinquent mortgages and mortgages in foreclosure rose to 13.6% of all mortgages (once again, just talking about first mortgages).

• The percentage of mortages 30-59 days late stayed stable, most of the increase was in seriously delinquent mortgages.  This may be a positive as it is showing that the pace of new delinquencies is not picking up, and that loans are staying seriously delinquent longer which is an indication that banks are working longer to modify before moving to foreclosure.

• Option Arms continue to be the worst performing loans with only 662% current.

• There was a large increase in the number of seriously delinquent prime loans as the number jumped fro 838k to 976k in one quarter.  Almost 1 in 25 prime borrowers is more than 60 days late on the mortgage.

• Overall, 7.1% of all mortgages are seriously delinquent (60+ days late) and an additional 3.4% are 30-59 days late.

• Although the Sub-Prime and Alt-A loans have the highest percentage of delinquencies, the Prime loans have the highest number – this is important as if the percentage of prime loans going bad keeps rising it has a real chance of bringing the market down again.  However, these are also the borrowers that have the best chance of recovering if employment and the economy continue to recover after the stimulus expires.

Home Retention Actions

• The number of home retention actions slipped by 19.1% compared to the third quarter.  This is probably likely to the fact that HAMP received so much publicity in the third quarter that most people who were eligible applied then. 
• Discouraging number on the HAMP program was that although 349k people had entered the 3 month trial period in the second and third quarters, only 21k of those received permanent modifications during the fourth quarter.  That’s about a 6% conversion rate (it’s too early to have data to see how many re-default).  If that is an accurate number (it is possible that many were delayed past 3 months by paperwork issues, etc.) then the program is really a failure.  Let’s hope the numbers get better.
• More than 50% of HAMP trial plans and modifications are for prime borrowers
• There were almost twice as many home retentions started as foreclosures (this would also explain the increase in seriously delinquent mortgages as they stay delinquent until fully modified).
• The percentage of loans modified that had principal reductions fell to 6.8%.  Rate reduction and capitalization (adding your late payments back to the loan) were the most common modifications.
• HAMP modifications only included principal reduction 0.1% of the time, but they did utilize principal deferral 26.8% of the time.
• 42% of all modifications decreased payments by 20% or more – this is important to the  borrower being able to keep up with payments on the modified mortgage.
• 82% of HAMP modifications decreased payments by 20% or more.

Modified Loan Performance

•  The performance of modifications continues to improve over time:
  • Only 33.5% of loans done in the second quarter of 2009 were 60+ days late six months later compared to 42.7% of loans in the first quarter.
  • Only 14.7% of loans modified in the third quarter were 60+ days late 90 days later as compared to 30.8% of the loans done in the first quarter of 2009.
• Loans 30+ days late were obviously a higher percentage; 47.5% after 6 months for loans modified in the second quarter and 29.8% after 3 months for loans modified in the third quarter.  Both of these are significantly better than they were prior to the second quarter.
• The highest Re-Default rate is for Government-Guaranteed loans (FHA, VA, etc.)  with 67.8% 60% days late a year after modification (these are obviously reflecting pre-HAMP modifications as none have been modified for a year yet).
• One reason to be a little more positive about HAMP modifications (if more get completed) is that they seem to be reducing payments by 20% or more, and historically loans that have payments reduced by 20% or more have a re-default rate of only 39.8% a year later (as opposed to 67% if the payments are unchanged).

Foreclosures

• Newly initiated foreclosures declined in the 4th quarter as homes are staying in the seriously delinquent phase longer as lenders are working harder on modifications.
• Completed foreclosures increased by 8.6% over the previous quarter and 35.7% higher than a year ago. 
• There are almost 4x as many foreclosures as short sales and Deed-in-Lieu actions, although short sales are up 96.8% over a year ago.
• 7.8% of all subprime mortgages are in foreclosure while only 2.3% of prime mortgages are in foreclosure (however since there are more prime mortgages, there are actually more total prime loans in foreclosure than subprime).

A couple of key numbers to look at next quarter will be:

• How many of the HAMP trial periods get converted to permanent modifications.
• If the loans that are seriously delinquent transfer into the foreclosed or modified category.
• If loans modified in the third quarter of 2009 and later continue to have a lower re-delinquency rate.

I expect that the data for the first quarter will continue to improve and the real questions will come with the second and third quarter data as that data will reflect the market after the stimulus has expired.

Monday Morning Coffee – Politics as Usual

Monday Morning Coffee

Delaying Foreclosures to Get Re-Elected

February 28, 2010

Good morning,

I hope you had a nice weekend.  We had the open house for our Rancho Bernardo office on Friday afternoon and had a nice turnout.  Thank you to everyone who stopped by.  After being cooped up in the house Saturday, it was nice getting out for a walk with Zach before going to the office on Sunday.  Most of Sunday was spent getting data ported over to our new web site which should be up and running by the end of the week.  Things are getting really busy and with the typical spring increase in activity coupled with ramping up the new office and switching over all our web sites, sleep seems to be  a luxury right now.  Very glad the team is running smoothly right now – speaking of team, Cori is doing well enough in her recovery from the multiple back surgeries that she is back handling our property management again.  It is nice to have her involved again.

A couple of quick notes on the market.  Things seem a little slower now than they were a couple of months ago.  Not so much that homes aren’t selling, but instead of 7-8 offers, we are getting 1 or 2.  It could just be that everyone bought when they thought the tax credit was expiring, but it could also be the start of a trend.

I saw an article last week that didn’t make sense.  The headline was: Obama May Prohibit Home-Loan Forelcosures Without HAMP Review.  I know some of you out there are going to make that silly argument about that Constitution thingy we studied in school, but I think there is a clause they didn’t tell us about where the President can ignore certain parts of it if he really needs to.  The effect of a HAMP review would be to delay the foreclosures for about three months (plus another three while they get the systems in place to process everything), so another 6 months of artificially tight supply.

Then, another piece fell into place on Friday.  A colleague of mine who does a lot of work with the foreclosure departments at many large banks and loan servicers was told that the banks are being pressured to keep their foreclosures off the market until after the mid-term elections.  That made me wonder if maybe the HAMP review proposal was designed to keep the foreclosures from hitting the market until after the election in November.  

Ok, so I went back and did a quick re-read of that same Constitution we slept through in high school.  And guess what?  The whole ”ignore sections of this document if they are inconvenient to your current crises or desire to be re-elected” clause never made it in there. 

I know I am making light of a bad situation, but I think that we ought to consult the original rule book every once and awhile to make sure we are still playing the right game.

Ok, enough on the whole Government hijacking the country theme.  Let’s talk about a positive!

We’ve got a great new listing in 4S Ranch.  This home has 4 bedroom suites (1 downstairs), a loft, and a great layout for the growing family.  Due to allergies of one of the children, almost every room has engineered wood flooring and the house is spotless.  If you know anyone wanting to move into the Poway School District, please shoot them over to the site.

We have a couple more new ones, but the virtual tours are not ready yet, so I will have them next week – along with the new web site!

Enjoy the Coffee!!!

Bad Temper

There once was a little boy who had a bad temper. His father gave him a bag of nails and told him that every time he lost his temper, he must hammer a nail into the back of the fence.

The first day, the boy had driven 37 nails into the fence. Over the next few weeks, as he learned to control his anger, the number of nails hammered daily gradually dwindled down. He discovered it was easier to hold his temper than to drive those nails into the fence.

Finally the day came when the boy didn’t lose his temper at all. He told his father about it and the father suggested that the boy now pull out one nail for each day that he was able to hold his temper. The days passed and the boy was finally able to tell his father that all the nails were gone.

The father took his son by the hand and led him to the fence. He said, “You have done well, my son, but look at the holes in the fence. The fence will never be the same. When you say things in anger, they leave a scar just like this one. You can put a knife in a man and draw it out. It won’t matter how many times you say I’m sorry the wound is still there. A verbal wound is as bad as a physical one.”

 Have a Great Week!

Scott Voak

Monday Morning Coffee – One West Bank and the FDIC

Monday Morning Coffee

One West Bank & The FDIC

February 22, 2010

Good morning,

I hope you had a great weekend.  As I am typing, the sky has opened up on another rain storm in San Diego.  This could complicate things as we have 3 new listings we need to shoot photos for on Tuesday (that’s called a teaser!)  I am going to give you a couple of quick notes and let you click through for more information.  But first – HAPPY BIRTHDAY CORI!  That’s right, my wife turns, well let’s just say younger than me today.  We are looking forward to going out with our friends John and Jean to celebrate tomorrow night.

Secondly, I am VERY HAPPY to announce that I have added Adriana Amon to my team as a buyers’ agent.  Adriana lives a long stone’s throw away from me in 4S Ranch and she has a strong background as a lender prior to stepping into her agent shoes two years ago.  She is very involved in the community and we have served together on charitable foundations in the past.  I was looking for someone who combined a love for real estate with a commitment to the community and for the 4S Ranch and Del Sur areas, she was the only person I considered (so good thing she accepted!)  We are happy to have her on board and look forward to great things.

Ok,  a couple of quick points on the real estate market:

• You may have seen a video last week being sent around that was done by a couple of mortgage brokers that ripped the FDIC for selling the assets of Indy mac to One West Bank.  The terms they allege are pretty bad as One West received a guarantee that the FDIC would cover loses on every loan and the losses were calculated from the original loan balance and not what One West paid for them.  The video is here.
• The FDIC took the unusual step of answering the video as it was spreading viraly.  Their response is here.
• Then, the brokers ran a response to the response which is here.

My thoughts on this are that One West did receive a great deal and I don’t like the fact that some of the One West senior management were the same people that helped cause this crash in the first place.  However, we also have to consider that the FDIC needs to get rid of the assets of these failed banks and there are not a lot of people walking around with the experience to run this type of bank nor the access to cash needed to make this purchase.  Because of these two factors, whomever bought the assets was going to have to get a great deal (if you know a good banker, and have a couple hundred million dollars you can get a hold of, you might get a similar deal).  That said, I think it is disgusting that the bank then insisted that the  borrowers doing the short sale sign a promissory note to complete the sale – the bank was not going to take a loss at all, saddling the defaulted homeowner with a permanent anchor as they try and swim to shore is inexcusable.

My second topic is on short sales.  We are finding the following is happening:

•  There is a lot of agents that are marketing themselves as ”short sale specialists” and are doing more harm than good.  These agents are listing homes 20% under market in order to drive a bunch of offers they can take to the bank.  The problem is, that banks are getting tired of agents underselling homes and are suspicious that the buyer may be related to either the agent or the seller.  Therefore, they come back with a higher counter or just foreclose.  Unfortunately, the house sits on the market for the 6-9 months the agent is trying to get the short sale approved and brings down the value of all the homes around it.  I spoke to one agent this weekend who had done this (and received so many calls she finally would only schedule appointments by text) and her position was that she wasn’t worried about the neighborhood but only about her client.  What she didn’t realize is that this is a tactic that doesn’t w ork anymore and only hurts everyone involved.   I think as agents, we have the responsibility to do the best we can for our clients and that we can do that in a way that doesn’t destroy neighborhood values.  However, we have very low standards of entry into real estate and not all agents share this view.  If you know someone thinking of a short sale, let them know that the banks are not blindly accepting offers significantly below market price and if they just list slightly below market, they will get the offers they need.
• We have noticed a big change in lender negotiating of short sales in the last 6 weeks.  Lenders are insisting on seeing owners IRA and 401k statements even though they cannot legally go after that money.  The strategy the banks are using is that if they own the second loan and turn down the short sale causing the first lender to foreclose, the second loan can chase the borrower for the money they have lost (as long as it isn’t purchase money).  They are betting that the borrower will dip into their retirement for a portion of the loan in exchange for not being chased for years. 
• While this is troubling, I don’t find it unethical by the banks.  After all, the borrower promised to pay the loan back and the bank can negotiate as hard as they want – just make sure you have a good negotiator on your side if you are looking at a short sale.
• I believe we are at the beginning of a trend where the banks are going to be harder on defaulted borrowers.  I think that initially they were fearful that the Obama led government would come down hard on them if they did not cooperate with loan modification programs.  But now that the Home Affordable Program is looking like a pretty solid failure and Obama has lost a lot of his political power, I think the banks are getting bolder in going after people who owe them money and are not paying.  Make sure you have a good legal and negotiating team on your side when taking on your bank.

Ok, we have some new listings coming out this week, but I will wait until we have photos to show you – weather permitting, that will be next Monday.

So, enjoy the Coffee!  This time it is once again by way of my Dad in Arizona (and no, I did not check it on Snopes, it is a good story regardless!)

RED MARBLES

I was at the corner grocery store buying some early potatoes.  I noticed a small boy, delicate of bone and feature, ragged but clean, hungrily appraising a basket of freshly picked green peas. 

With loving gentleness she lifted the lifeless fingers of her deceased husband. Resting underneath were three exquisitely shined red marbles. 

I was at the corner grocery store buying some early potatoes.  I noticed a small boy, delicate of bone and feature, ragged but clean, hungrily appraising a basket of freshly picked green peas. I paid for my potatoes but was also drawn to the display of fresh green peas. I am a pushover for creamed peas and new potatoes. Pondering the peas, I couldn’t help overhearing the conversation between Mr. Miller (the store owner) and the ragged boy next to me. ’Hello Barry, how are you today?’ ’H'lo , Mr. Miller. Fine, thank ya. Jus’ admirin’ them peas. They sure look good.’ ’They are good, Barry. How’s your Ma?’ ’Fine. Gittin’ stronger alla’ time.’ ’Good. Anything I can help you with?’ ’No, Sir. Jus’ admirin’ them peas.’ ’Would you like to take some home ?’ asked Mr.. Miller. ’No, Sir. Got nuthin’ to pay for ‘em with.’ ’Well, what have you to trade me for some of those peas?’ ’All I got’s my prize mar ble here.’ ’Is that right? Let me see it’ said Miller.. ’Here ’tis. She’s a dandy.’ ’I can see that.. Hmmmmm, only thing is this one is blue and I sort of go for red. Do you have a red one like this at home ?’ the store owner asked. ’Not zackley but almost..’ ’Tell you what. Take this sack of peas home with you and next trip this way let me look at that red marble’.. Mr. Miller told the boy. ’Sure will. Thanks Mr. Miller.’ Mrs. Miller, who had been standing nearby, came over to help me.. With a smile she said, ‘There are two other boys like him in our community, all three are in very poor circumstances. Jim just loves to bargain with them for peas, apples, tomatoes, or whatever. When they come back with their red marbles, and they always do, he decides he doesn’t like red after all and he sends them home with a bag of produce for a green marble or an orange one, when they come on their next trip to the store..’ I left the store smiling to m yself, impressed with this man. A short time later I moved to Colorado , but I never forgot the story of this man, the boys, and their bartering for marbles. Several years went by, each more rapid than the previous one. Just recently I had occasion to visit some old friends in that Idaho community and while I was there learned that Mr. Miller had died. They were having his visitation that evening and knowing my friends wanted to go, I agreed to accompany them. Upon arrival at the mortuary we fell into line to meet the relatives of the deceased and to offer whatever words of comfort we could. Ahead of us in line were three young men. One was in an army uniform and the other two wore nice haircuts, dark suits and white shirts….all very professional looking. They approached Mrs. Miller, standing composed and smiling by her husband’s casket. Each of the young men hugged her, kissed her on the cheek, spoke briefly with her, and moved on to the casket.. Her misty lig ht blue eyes followed them as, one by one; each young man stopped briefly and placed his own warm hand over the cold pale hand in the casket. Each left the mortuary awkwardly, wiping his eyes. Our turn came to meet Mrs. Miller. I told her who I was and reminded her of the story from those many years ago and what she had told me about her husband’s bartering for marbles. With her eyes glistening, she took my hand and led me to the casket. ’Those three young men who just left were the boys I told you about. They just told me how they appreciated the things Jim ‘traded’ them. Now, at last, when Jim could not change his mind about colour or size…..they came to pay their debt.’ ’We’ve never had a great deal of the wealth of this world,’ she confided, ‘but right now, Jim would consider himself the richest man in Idaho.’ With loving gentleness she lifted the lifeless fingers of her deceased husband. Resting underneath were three exquisitely shined red marbles. 

Have a Great Week!

Scott Voak

Monday Morning Coffee – What happens when the Fed stops buying Mortgages?

Monday Morning Coffee

What Happens when the Fed stops buying MSBE’s?

Januray 17, 2010

Good morning,

I hope you had a great weekend.  We were very busy as we had 18 friends over for dinner on Friday night and went to the San Diego Association of Realtors Installation Dinner where our friend Mark Marquez was installed as President on Saturday night.  So now, it is a race for bed!

Updated my blog earlier today with a post on what is going to happen when the Fed stops buying MSBEs in March.  The short version is that the market will slow, interest rates will rise and they will step in again to resume purchases, but on a smaller scale with rates up about 1% over the year.  The long version is here.

We have a new couple of new homes this week, but due to lingering issues with the office move, I do not have single property sites up for them yet.  Both are short sales:

Palomino Plan 3 in 4S – 4550sf 6 bedroom home with a 4 car garage on a very large lot.  It is priced at $900k.  We have offers on this and will probably be off the market early in the week.

Canyon Ridge Plan 2 in 4S – 3600+ sf 4 bedroom home with an loft and an office over the garage.  This is also a large lot and has a pool (but there is an issue with underground water that needs to be dealt with or at least acknowledged).  There are no showings on this until next weekend when we will have an open house (owners are packing).  It is priced at $800k.

That’s it – I will have single property sites for them next week.

Enjoy the Coffee!

This week I am revisiting a story I posted last year for an update.  It’s the one about the autistic basketball player and hits home for Cori and I as Zach’s Fragile-X puts him on the autistism spectum.  As he is getting older, his issues are becoming more pronounced and we gain more respect every day for both our own son and other families that navigate the world of autism/Fragile-X every day.  He is almost 4, and although I prefer he take up soccer to basketball (due to my own limited skills), any way he can have a moment like this would be worth it.  Videos like this are a great source of hope for parents who have handicapped children.

Have a Great Week!

Scott

Prediction for when the Fed stops buying MBSEs

I was looking at numbers over the last year as they related to sales values to try and figure out what effect that Fed’s purchases of Mortgage Backed Securities has been.  A major problem it getting accurate numbers is that housing prices are reported as an average or median price.  In markets that are consistent, this is a good method to use.  However, when the market changes (as it has recently) the median price especially becomes less and less meaningful.  Here’s a quick explanation:

Let’s say there are 10 houses that sell. 

• 4 are two bedroom homes that sell for $200k.
• 2 are four bedroom homes that sell for $400k.
• 4 are six bedroom homes that sell for $600k. 
• In this case, your median price is $400k (median is the price of the average home, not the average price of homes). 

 Now, let’s say the price for each home increases $50,000.  However, due to a factor such as loans being difficult or no inventory being available on 6 bedroom homes, we sell the following homes:

• 4 two bedroom homes for $250k.
• 2 four bedroom homes for $450k.
• 1 six bedroom home for $650k.
• In this case, your median price is $250k. 

Here is a simplistic example showing that the median price fell even though the price on every home increased.  It is also the reason why current data on housing prices is to be viewed a little skeptically.  My guess is that the data on median prices is under reporting the gain in housing because the shift has been towards more less expensive homes selling which brings the median down. 

So, I looked at my favorite housing micro-economy, 4S Ranch.  Here I can break houses down to similar sizes and ownership (condo vs fee simple) and look at what a slice of homes has done over several years.  In some of the data segments, there are not enough sales to be meaningful,  but in others, there is a large enough sample size to give a relatively clear picture.  A problem does come into play when one segment has several short sales or foreclosures in a quarter as they skew the prices downward.  Going through the home sales for the past year and trying to adjust for foreclosures, etc.  I come to the following conclusions (with reservation as this is not exact by any means and there is a good margin for error):

• Detached homes priced under $650k were up 5-12% (the 12% is a little shaky due to small sample size).  I would feel fairly comfortable saying these homes are up in general about 7% in the last year.
• Homes priced above $800k slumped early in the year, but have made it back to about even. 

I think a large part of the difference here is the fact that loans are much easier to get in the lower price ranges (in fact, all of the homes I have sold over $800k in the last year have been bought by buyers with large downpayments.  There are almost no loans above $700k to be had).  The only reason that loans below $700k are available at current interest rates is that the Fed has been buying them from the banks to the tune of many BBBBillions of dollars a week.  If this ends as scheduled in March, rates are going to have to rise for the following very simple reason – we have to entice someone else to buy the loans.  Here’s a fictional conversation between Bank of America and China:  Remember those BBBBillions of dollars of loans we sold you a couple of years ago?  We know it didn’t turn out real well for you what with all those defaults and foreclosures.  But….how about buying a couple hundred BBBBillion more?  It is not too hard to see that China (or any other buyer of mortgages) is going to want a higher return for taking on the risk.  A higher return for them means higher rates for you and me. 

So, if the Fed stops buying mortgages as planned in March, rates will rise rather quickly.  How high and how fast?  Well they have to rise high enough that the rest of the world will buy the loans, but not high enough that people stop buying houses.  Market “experts” think rates will rise between .75% and 2%.  If they rise 1.5%, it could take someone who qualifies for a $640k loan down to about a $495k loan.  That would take the wind right out of the housing market.  A buyer who has been looking at a $675k house an imagining the four bedrooms is not going to put the same payment into a three bedroom condo.  They will likely sit on the sidelines and we will see the number of transactions slow dramatically until prices fall enough to put our buyer back into a four bedroom house. 

So, do I think prices are neccessarily going to drop 20%?  No.  For the same reason I predicted in August that the Home Buyer Tax Credit would be extended – politicians are running the show.  I am not an economist, but I have at least a basic understanding of the markets.  However, I think it is fairly easy to predict what is going to happen – so, here it goes:

• Rates will start to rise in mid-late February (loans that start in mid February will be completed in mid March and have to be sold in late March, when the Fed is scheduled to stop buying them).
• By the end of March it will be pretty clear that rising rates have slowed down the housing market and talk will start fresh about a housing led double-dip recession.
• Democrats who control the entire political engine in Washington will very quickly realize that a summer recession with ever increasing unemployment and vacant foreclosed homes will translate into a lot of lost seats in the House of Representatives in the November election.
• By mid-April (if not sooner) the Fed will announce that they will resume buying MBSEs although on a smaller scale (this will be an attempt to create a soft landing).
• The market will stabilize again although we are not likely to see the same enthusiasm for real estate as we are seeing right now.  This is because the Fed eventually has to get out of buying all the mortgages the banks can write (don’t they?), and as they do, rates will slowly creep up.

Since I am making the prediction, it is sure to not happen, but I think we will end the year with mortgage rates about .75-1% higher than they are today and prices within 3-5% of where they are although they may bounce around a lot before settling down.