<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Voak Homes &#187; Real Estate Crash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.voakhomes.com/category/economy/real-estate-crash/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.voakhomes.com</link>
	<description>Voak Homes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:20:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Resale Numbers and the Success of HAMP</title>
		<link>http://www.voakhomes.com/228</link>
		<comments>http://www.voakhomes.com/228#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Voak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Crash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Real Estate Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voakhomes.com/?p=228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Numbers for resale homes in July of 2010, plus an exerpt on why the Treasury thinks HAMP was a success.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float:right;padding:0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.voakhomes.com/228"></a></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voakhomes.com%2F228"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voakhomes.com%2F228&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p id="top" />
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Resale Numbers Dissappoint &#8211; but&#8230;  HAMP was a Success!</h2>
<p>NAR released the July home resale numbers, and as predicted, they fell significantly.  The fell far below analysts expectations, and even farther that I predicted in my Coffee on Monday.  Here are two graphs that illustrate the results (once again taken from <a href="http://www.CaluclatedRiskBlog.com">www.CaluclatedRiskBlog.com</a>)</p>
<p>This first one shows home sales by month (resale homes only):</p>
<div id="attachment_229" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 1034px"><a href="http://www.voakhomes.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/EHSJuly2010.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-229" title="Existing Homes Sales July 2010" src="http://www.voakhomes.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/EHSJuly2010-1024x686.jpg" alt="Graph of existing home sales July 2010.  Data from NAR" width="1024" height="686" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Existing Home Sales Slump in July</p></div>
<p> </p>
<p>You can see the trend was clearly down until early 2009 when the administration stimulated the housing market with the tax credit.  Sales spiked in November of 2009 with the scheduled expiration of the tax credit and then again early this year with the real end of the tax credit.  Now, we have resumed the downard trend.  Based on August numbers in the San Diego market so far (I know, small sample size), it looks like things may get a little worse (July sales were down in San Diego 20% from a year ago and I think August will be down about 24%), I will look at the numbers more closely in next week&#8217;s Coffee. </p>
<p>With the combination of slower sales and more homes being put on the market by builders (new construction spurred by the short term rise in demand), banks (more aggressively processing foreclosures), and individuals (summer season sees more homes offered for sale), inventory as measured by months of sales, spiked:</p>
<div id="attachment_230" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 1034px"><a href="http://www.voakhomes.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/EHSMonthsJuly2010.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-230" title="US Home Sales - July Months of Inventory Available" src="http://www.voakhomes.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/EHSMonthsJuly2010-1024x659.jpg" alt="Graph showing a spike in inventory of homes for sale in July" width="1024" height="659" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nationwide Inventory Jumps to over 12 months</p></div>
<p> </p>
<p>Ouch, that&#8217;s a big jump.  Inventory rising that quickly in one month is a bad indicator.  Plus, as foreclosures will continue to be put on the market, this number could grow to 14-15 months.  Inventory levels over 6-7 months usually result in lower prices.  Fortunately, we are in much better shape here in San Diego with inventory levels still under 5 months.  However, significantly lower sales levels in August will drive that number up.</p>
<p>I found an interesting article about a meeting at the Treasury between top players there (including Geitner) and several prominent bloggers.  You can see the article <a href="http://www.interfluidity.com/v2/933.html">here</a>.  The blog this is taken from is <a href="http://www.interfluidity.com">www.interfluidity.com</a>.  The interesting part was when they addressed HAMP, you know, the Home Affordable Modification Program.  While it has been considered by most to be a failure, the Treasury thinks it was a success because it basically pushed the foreclosure problem down the road 3-6 months so the banks could recover.  The argument was that if all the homes had been foreclosed on instead of going through the delay, the system might have failed:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">The conversation next turned to housing and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_Affordable_Modification_Program">HAMP</a>. On HAMP, officials were surprisingly candid. The program has gotten a lot of bad press in terms of its Kafka-esque qualification process and its limited success in generating mortgage modifications under which families become able and willing to pay their debt. Officials pointed out that what may have been an agonizing process for individuals was a useful palliative for the system as a whole. Even if most HAMP applicants ultimately default, the program prevented an outbreak of foreclosures exactly when the system could have handled it least. There were murmurs among the bloggers of “extend and pretend”, but I don’t think that’s quite right. This was extend-and-don’t-even-bother-to-pretend. The program was successful in the sense that it kept the patient alive until it had begun to heal. And the patient of this metaphor was not a struggling homeowner, but the financial system, a.k.a. the banks. Policymakers openly judged HAMP to be a qualified success because it helped banks muddle through what might have been a fatal shock. I believe these policymakers conflate, in full sincerity, incumbent financial institutions with “the system”, “the economy”, and “ordinary Americans”. Treasury officials are not cruel people. I’m sure they would have preferred if the program had worked out better for homeowners as well. But they have larger concerns, and from their perspective, HAMP has helped to address those.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an interesting take, and correct from the standpoint that it helped the system.  Isn&#8217;t it interesting that when the politicians sold it to us, they emphasized the saving of people&#8217;s homes rather than saving the system.  Also a sidelight to watch is  now that the stimulus is over, we are seeing the foreclosures that were delayed by HAMP start to be processed just as demand is falling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voakhomes.com/228/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday Morning Coffee &#8211; Home Sales Data out Tomorrow</title>
		<link>http://www.voakhomes.com/226</link>
		<comments>http://www.voakhomes.com/226#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Voak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Monday Morning Coffee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Crash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Real Estate Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voakhomes.com/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three new listings in the San Diego area available.  NAR releases July resale home data tomorrow.  The analists expect a 4.8M annual rate, more likely to be around 4.0M, which would increase fears of a double dip.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float:right;padding:0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.voakhomes.com/226"></a></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voakhomes.com%2F226"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voakhomes.com%2F226&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p id="top" />
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Monday Morning Coffee</h2>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">New Listings Plus Home Sales Data out Tomorrow</h2>
<p>Good morning,</p>
<p>I hope you had a nice weekend.  Mine was interupted by something called the Security Tool virus.  A bundle of joy that took 5 hours to fix (of course, I didn&#8217;t fix it &#8211; luckly, I have a client who is much more familiar with network security who spent a good part of his weekend fixing it.  Thanks Marc!)  I did find time to work with Cori and make our first ever batch of jam from our tree (golden nectarines).  The good news is it tastes good and the jars sealed.  The bad news is it didn&#8217;t jell, so we have lots of golden nectarine sorta jelly runny stuff.  Oh well.</p>
<p>This week, the big real estate news will come on Tuesday when the National Association of Realtors announces the Existing Home Sales for July.  Last month was off a bit as the affect of the tax credit started to appear.  This month, I expect it to be off a lot.  The &#8220;experts&#8221; are predicting a rate of 4.65M annual sales (June was 5.27M).  I think that the number will be closer to 4.0M &#8211; in which case the stock market will probably react negatively as a number that low could be seen as a strong indicator of a double dip in housing.</p>
<p>We do have two new listings this week, but they aren&#8217;t the two I thought we would have (there is also a home that fell out of escrow:</p>
<ul>
<li>A 2 bedroom condo in Point Loma.  This home will be vacant in a couple of weeks and I will get photos and more information to you then.  We have not priced it yet as a lot can change by the time we get ready to go on the market.</li>
<li>A 3 bedroom home in Sabre Springs with open space behind it.  This is on a sought after street and will be a great home.  We are going to need to paint it and do a few touch ups, but it is a relocation, so it may take a week or two to get going.</li>
<li>The home we had fall out of escrow is  a short sale on the north side of 4S Ranch.  It is a 4 bedroom homes with almost 3,500 sf of living space.  The approved price for the short sale is $700k with a credit to the buyer.  It fell out of escrow &#8211; this is a good one &#8211; because the family buying it lives in China and the wife can&#8217;t get to the consulate in Beijing to sign documents and won&#8217;t be in the US for a couple of months (arrghhhh!)</li>
</ul>
<p>That&#8217;s it for this week.  Enjoy the Coffee!</p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Time</h2>
<p>Time is an equal opportunity employer. Each human being has exactly the same number of hours and minutes every day.</p>
<p>Rich people can&#8217;t buy more time. Scientists can&#8217;t invent new minutes. And you can&#8217;t save time to spend on another day.</p>
<p>Even so, time is amazingly fair and forgiving. No matter how much time you&#8217;ve wasted in the past, you still have an entire tomorrow.</p>
<p>Success depends upon using it wisely &#8211; - by planning and setting priorities. Time is worth more than money, and by killing time, we are killing our own chances of success.</p>
<p>Author Unknown.</p>
<p>Have a Great Week!</p>
<p>Scott Voak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voakhomes.com/226/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday Morning Coffee</title>
		<link>http://www.voakhomes.com/224</link>
		<comments>http://www.voakhomes.com/224#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Voak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Monday Morning Coffee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Crash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voakhomes.com/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No foreclosure data out from Fannie, Freddie and FHA]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float:right;padding:0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.voakhomes.com/224"></a></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voakhomes.com%2F224"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voakhomes.com%2F224&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p id="top" />Good morning,</p>
<p>I hope you enjoyed the weekend.  It was a nice mix of work and play (although if you had told me 30 years ago I would have call working in the yard &#8220;play&#8221;, and I think I would have told you you were nuts &#8211; right Dad?)  We started thinning out our spaghetti squash and I weighed a couple of them and realized that one plant was giving us about 75lbs of squash, which is about $110 worth of food from one seed.  I thought this was pretty cool until I realized we have to eat another 55lbs of squash to get this benefit.  Why can&#8217;t they make steak plants?</p>
<p>I took a look at some new data on mortgages and foreclosures from Fannie, Freddie and FHA.  I posted the information (which came from CalculatedRiskBlog.com) on the <a title="Voak Homes Web Site" href="http://click.icptrack.com/icp/relay.php?r=59254087&amp;msgid=794139&amp;act=UJD1&amp;c=348890&amp;destination=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voakhomes.com">site</a> yesterday, so I won&#8217;t bore you here.</p>
<p>Although the market is slow, we are continuing to receive offers, and are actually having some success getting a few into escrow.  I should have 2 small, detached condos in the 4S area to tell you about next week (although photos will be a week later).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it, enjoy the coffee!</p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Birds And The Wisdom They Impart</h2>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">by Elisabeth Folino</h2>
<p><strong> </strong><br />
This morning, listening to the birds greet a beautiful sunny winter&#8217;s morning, it occurred to me that rain or shine the birds always greet the mornings in exactly the same way. They always start it singing with all their might, greeting the day with their beautiful songs and just getting on with the business of living life fully. One can learn so much by watching them.</p>
<p>I like to feed the birds on my balcony; I live in an apartment and can&#8217;t have any pets as it is against the rules. I mainly get sparrows and speckled turtledoves, a couple of pigeons and in summer, I get regular visits from rainbow lorikeets. All are fun to watch and all bring joy to my heart. Watching them is relaxing and a form of meditation for me.</p>
<p>The other day, one of the pigeons had got himself stuck in my balcony railing. I thought he was dead. It made me so sad and then, when I went outside, it started to struggle. My heart was filled with joy; it was not dead just exhausted from the effort of trying to free himself.</p>
<p>As I approached the bird, he got more frantic so I soothingly told him not to struggle. He froze, perhaps in fear. I like to think that he could feel the vibration of my not wanting to harm him. I gently placed my hand under him (he was so light) and I lifted him up to set him free. He flew up to the roof of my flat and watched as I put the usual seeds out. Low and behold, after his ordeal, he came right back down to my balcony and ate his breakfast with the rest of the birds.</p>
<p>Why am I sharing all this? Well, for one, it was amazing to actually hold a wild pigeon in my hands even if it was for just one second and I just had to share, but I also could not resist sharing the lesson that this situation brought my way.</p>
<p>Life is full of obstacles; some very real, like the bars holding the pigeon back, and some are imagined but we struggle against them till we are exhausted. Sometimes the answer is with a friend. All it takes is a little lift, a little guidance in the right direction and away we go, free again to soar just like my little feathered friend.</p>
<p>The biggest lesson however, from all this, is how my little feathered friend recovered from the situation. He didn&#8217;t sit on the roof looking down at the evil balcony that had tried to trap him; he didn&#8217;t relive the frightening situation over and over again. Nope! Down he came to eat his breakfast and live the life he was meant to live.</p>
<p>We can learn so much from birds. They truly know how to live in the now. I believe the lesson here is that sometimes life is hard and we get stuck but often help, in the form of a friend, can set us to set us free. Remaining free, however, is up to us.</p>
<p>Another thing that I have noticed is that while feeding, some of the birds are rather aggressive and tend to chase away the others trying to keep all the seeds to themselves. The funny part is that they can&#8217;t chase all of them away and that while they are so busy chasing the others away, they are missing out.</p>
<p>How often do we do that in life? Instead of just getting on with a job, we watch and criticize others only to find that while we have been busy trying to assert ourselves and prove how good we are, that all of a sudden a quiet achiever has managed to do the job and reap the rewards we were so trying to reap.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it amazing how so many life lessons can be found just by observing nature&#8217;s creatures!</p>
<p>Have a Great Week!</p>
<p>Scott Voak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voakhomes.com/224/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Updated Foreclosure Data</title>
		<link>http://www.voakhomes.com/219</link>
		<comments>http://www.voakhomes.com/219#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 03:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Voak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Crash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Real Estate Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voakhomes.com/?p=219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Graphs showing homeowners with negative equity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float:right;padding:0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.voakhomes.com/219"></a></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voakhomes.com%2F219"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voakhomes.com%2F219&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p id="top" />
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Updated Government Foreclosure Data</h2>
<p>This week, the government released some updated foreclosure date from Q2.  These charts are re-prints from a blog I subscribe to called CalculatedRisk.   It can be found at <a href="http://www.CalculatedRiskBlog.com">www.CalculatedRiskBlog.com</a>  I highly recommend it as the person who runs it does a pretty good job of assimilating different economic data.  Even if I don&#8217;t always like it, which brings me to the following charts:</p>
<div id="attachment_220" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 954px"><a href="http://www.voakhomes.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/FHAFannieFreddieQ22010.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-220" title="FHAFannieFreddieQ22010" src="http://www.voakhomes.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/FHAFannieFreddieQ22010.jpg" alt="Government Held Foreclosures" width="944" height="740" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Government Guaranteed and Owned Foreclosures</p></div>
<p>This first chart shows that Fannie, Freddie and FHA are now the proud owners of almost 250,000 homes (this is not all the foreclosures, just the ones taxpayers are on the hook directly for).  The number is increasing as banks are processing more foreclosures for people who just don&#8217;t qualify for a loan modification. </p>
<p>This next chart taxes it a step farther and is really what caught my attention, it shows how many people are upside down on their mortgages.  This is important because if the economy were to go into another recession, these are people who have less incentive to hold onto their homes.  I look at it as the worst case, since anyone with positive equity would try to sell and avoid foreclosure. </p>
<div id="attachment_221" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 1066px"><a href="http://www.voakhomes.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/HomeownersinNegativeEquityQ12010.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-221" title="Upside Down Homeowners" src="http://www.voakhomes.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/HomeownersinNegativeEquityQ12010.jpg" alt="Homeowners with Negative Equity at the end of the 1st Quarter" width="1056" height="708" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Almost one-third of homeowners are underwater</p></div>
<p> The number are scary &#8211; 30.6% of homeowners under water and a total of almost $2.4B under water (this is just the portion of their loan in excess of the home value).  Also, these are first mortgages; more people are under water if you consider their second mortgages also.  But, it&#8217;s not all bad.  The next chart made me happy I don&#8217;t live in Nevada!</p>
<div id="attachment_222" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 1046px"><a href="http://www.voakhomes.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/HomeownersNegativeEquitybyState.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-222" title="Homeowners Negative Equity by State" src="http://www.voakhomes.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/HomeownersNegativeEquitybyState.jpg" alt="The percentage of home owners with negative equity by state" width="1036" height="687" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Negative Equity by State</p></div>
<p>Ouch.  California doesn&#8217;t look as bad as some of these other states.  And, for those of us in San Diego, we&#8217;re better off than most of California.</p>
<p> Combining all three of these charts, it is evident that the housing recovery is tenuous at best.   Combined with the slowing pace of sales after the tax credit expiration I believe it is cause for concern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voakhomes.com/219/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Treasury Department Foreclosure Report</title>
		<link>http://www.voakhomes.com/162</link>
		<comments>http://www.voakhomes.com/162#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 02:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Voak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Crash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short Sale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voakhomes.com/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look at key data from the fourth quarter of 2009 Mortgage Metrics report.  Shows delinquencies increasing but foreclosures slowing down.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float:right;padding:0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.voakhomes.com/162"></a></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voakhomes.com%2F162"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voakhomes.com%2F162&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p id="top" />
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Foreclosure and Mortgage Deliquencies</h2>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Q4 2009</h2>
<p style="text-align: left;">I finally finished the OCC and OTS Mmortgage Metrics Report for the fourth quarter of 2009 (I know you&#8217;re jealous at how much fun I get to have).   The report looks at all first liens held by most of the largest mortgage servicers.  It covers almost 34 million loans totaling almost $6 trillion.  It is the raw data before it gets spun by the press or politicians.  Here are some highlights and lowlights from the report:</p>
<h3 style="text-align: left;">Delinquent Mortgages</h3>
<ul>
<li>
<p style="text-align: left;">Mortgage performance declined for the seventh consecutive quarter.  Delinquent mortgages and mortgages in foreclosure rose to 13.6% of all mortgages (once again, just talking about first mortgages).</p>
</li>
<li>
<p style="text-align: left;">The percentage of mortages 30-59 days late stayed stable, most of the increase was in seriously delinquent mortgages.  This may be a positive as it is showing that the pace of new delinquencies is not picking up, and that loans are staying seriously delinquent longer which is an indication that banks are working longer to modify before moving to foreclosure.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p style="text-align: left;">Option Arms continue to be the worst performing loans with only 662% current.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p style="text-align: left;">There was a large increase in the number of seriously delinquent prime loans as the number jumped fro 838k to 976k in one quarter.  Almost 1 in 25 prime borrowers is more than 60 days late on the mortgage.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p style="text-align: left;">Overall, 7.1% of all mortgages are seriously delinquent (60+ days late) and an additional 3.4% are 30-59 days late.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p style="text-align: left;">Although the Sub-Prime and Alt-A loans have the highest percentage of delinquencies, the Prime loans have the highest number &#8211; this is important as if the percentage of prime loans going bad keeps rising it has a real chance of bringing the market down again.  However, these are also the borrowers that have the best chance of recovering if employment and the economy continue to recover after the stimulus expires.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<h2 style="text-align: left;">Home Retention Actions</h2>
<ul>
<li>
<div style="text-align: left;">The number of home retention actions slipped by 19.1% compared to the third quarter.  This is probably likely to the fact that HAMP received so much publicity in the third quarter that most people who were eligible applied then. </div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: left;">Discouraging number on the HAMP program was that although 349k people had entered the 3 month trial period in the second and third quarters, only 21k of those received permanent modifications during the fourth quarter.  That&#8217;s about a 6% conversion rate (it&#8217;s too early to have data to see how many re-default).  If that is an accurate number (it is possible that many were delayed past 3 months by paperwork issues, etc.) then the program is really a failure.  Let&#8217;s hope the numbers get better.</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: left;">More than 50% of HAMP trial plans and modifications are for prime borrowers</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: left;">There were almost twice as many home retentions started as foreclosures (this would also explain the increase in seriously delinquent mortgages as they stay delinquent until fully modified).</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: left;">The percentage of loans modified that had principal reductions fell to 6.8%.  Rate reduction and capitalization (adding your late payments back to the loan) were the most common modifications.</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: left;">HAMP modifications only included principal reduction 0.1% of the time, but they did utilize principal deferral 26.8% of the time.</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: left;">42% of all modifications decreased payments by 20% or more &#8211; this is important to the  borrower being able to keep up with payments on the modified mortgage.</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: left;">82% of HAMP modifications decreased payments by 20% or more.</div>
</li>
</ul>
<h2 style="text-align: left;">Modified Loan Performance</h2>
<ul>
<li>
<div style="text-align: left;"> The performance of modifications continues to improve over time:</div>
<ul>
<li>
<div style="text-align: left;">Only 33.5% of loans done in the second quarter of 2009 were 60+ days late six months later compared to 42.7% of loans in the first quarter.</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: left;">Only 14.7% of loans modified in the third quarter were 60+ days late 90 days later as compared to 30.8% of the loans done in the first quarter of 2009.</div>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: left;">Loans 30+ days late were obviously a higher percentage; 47.5% after 6 months for loans modified in the second quarter and 29.8% after 3 months for loans modified in the third quarter.  Both of these are significantly better than they were prior to the second quarter.</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: left;">The highest Re-Default rate is for Government-Guaranteed loans (FHA, VA, etc.)  with 67.8% 60% days late a year after modification (these are obviously reflecting pre-HAMP modifications as none have been modified for a year yet).</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: left;">One reason to be a little more positive about HAMP modifications (if more get completed) is that they seem to be reducing payments by 20% or more, and historically loans that have payments reduced by 20% or more have a re-default rate of only 39.8% a year later (as opposed to 67% if the payments are unchanged).</div>
</li>
</ul>
<h2 style="text-align: left;">Foreclosures</h2>
<ul>
<li>
<div style="text-align: left;">Newly initiated foreclosures declined in the 4th quarter as homes are staying in the seriously delinquent phase longer as lenders are working harder on modifications.</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: left;">Completed foreclosures increased by 8.6% over the previous quarter and 35.7% higher than a year ago. </div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: left;">There are almost 4x as many foreclosures as short sales and Deed-in-Lieu actions, although short sales are up 96.8% over a year ago.</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: left;">7.8% of all subprime mortgages are in foreclosure while only 2.3% of prime mortgages are in foreclosure (however since there are more prime mortgages, there are actually more total prime loans in foreclosure than subprime).</div>
</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: left;"> </p>
<p style="text-align: left;">A couple of key numbers to look at next quarter will be:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<div style="text-align: left;">How many of the HAMP trial periods get converted to permanent modifications.</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: left;">If the loans that are seriously delinquent transfer into the foreclosed or modified category.</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: left;">If loans modified in the third quarter of 2009 and later continue to have a lower re-delinquency rate.</div>
</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: left;">I expect that the data for the first quarter will continue to improve and the real questions will come with the second and third quarter data as that data will reflect the market after the stimulus has expired.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voakhomes.com/162/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday Morning Coffee &#8211; How does Greece affect your mortgage?</title>
		<link>http://www.voakhomes.com/128</link>
		<comments>http://www.voakhomes.com/128#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Voak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Monday Morning Coffee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Crash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Real Estate Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.my4sranch.com/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Greece defaults on their bond payments, it could cause a seizure in credit markets which might effect mortgages here in San Diego.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float:right;padding:0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.voakhomes.com/128"></a></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voakhomes.com%2F128"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voakhomes.com%2F128&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p id="top" />
<h1 style="text-align: center;">Monday Morning Coffee</h1>
<h1 style="text-align: center;">Greece Defaulting Could Ripple into Your Mortgage</h1>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">February 14, 2010</h2>
<p>Good morning,</p>
<p>I hope you had a very nice Valentines Day.  We celebrated a day early and enjoyed a quiet night at the Rancho Bernardo Inn (no 6:00 am wake-up!)  I&#8217;ve been reading a lot of various &#8220;experts&#8221; talk about what direction the market is going to go.  What I have found is the stock analyists in general say we&#8217;re going up (they sell stocks, so that makes sense).  People in the bond market say we&#8217;re going down (also makes sense as they want to sell bonds).  People selling gold, well they&#8217;ve been saying the end is near since just about the begining.  So, I don&#8217;t have any answers at this point, but I sure don&#8217;t feel very comfortable with rising debt, Greece potentially defaulting and the end of the stimulous around the corner.  My guess is that the Fed steps in and extends (although at about 1/2 the rate) the purchase of mortgages in an effort to provide a soft landing for the real estate market.</p>
<p>I was spending some time trying to write out in easy terms how we got into this mess (mostly hoping it would help me see how we were going to get out of it).  After about 6 hours, a client showed me a very cool web site (if he had come in the day before, I could have saved the 6 hours!).  This is the best description <a href="http://click.icptrack.com/icp/relay.php?r=59254087&amp;msgid=775725&amp;act=UJD1&amp;c=348890&amp;destination=http%3A%2F%2Fcrisisofcredit.com%2F">I have seen for how we arrived where we are today</a>, and it is done at about the 8th grade level.</p>
<p>We have a new site up for our listing in the Garden Gate community of 4S Ranch.  <a href="http://click.icptrack.com/icp/relay.php?r=59254087&amp;msgid=775725&amp;act=UJD1&amp;c=348890&amp;destination=http%3A%2F%2FBayleelane.com">We started showing this 4 bedroom, 2300+ sf home</a> yesterday and currently have one offer in.  If you know someone who would be interested, please have them call me!</p>
<p>We also have a great <a href="http://click.icptrack.com/icp/relay.php?r=59254087&amp;msgid=775725&amp;act=UJD1&amp;c=348890&amp;destination=http%3A%2F%2Fsandiego.craigslist.org%2Fcsd%2Fapa%2F1600984610.html">3 bedroom condo in Pacific Beach for rent</a>.  It is located on Crown Point with a view of the water.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it for this week.  Enjoy the coffee!</p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Just Five More Minutes<br />
  by: Author Unknown, Source Unknown</h2>
<p> </p>
<p>While at the park one day, a woman sat down next to a man on a bench near a playground.</p>
<p>“That’s my son over there,” she said, pointing to a little boy in a red sweater who was gliding down the slide.</p>
<p>“He’s a fine looking boy” the man said. “That’s my daughter on the bike in the white dress.”</p>
<p>Then, looking at his watch, he called to his daughter. “What do you say we go, Melissa?”</p>
<p>Melissa pleaded, “Just five more minutes, Dad. Please? Just five more minutes.”</p>
<p>The man nodded and Melissa continued to ride her bike to her heart’s content. Minutes passed and the father stood and called again to his daughter. “Time to go now?”</p>
<p>Again Melissa pleaded, “Five more minutes, Dad. Just five more minutes.”</p>
<p>The man smiled and said, “OK.”</p>
<p>“My, you certainly are a patient father,” the woman responded.</p>
<p>The man smiled and then said, “Her older brother Tommy was killed by a drunk driver last year while he was riding his bike near here. I never spent much time with Tommy and now I’d give anything for just five more minutes with him. I’ve vowed not to make the same mistake with Melissa.</p>
<p>She thinks she has five more minutes to ride her bike. The truth is, I get Five more minutes to watch her play.”</p>
<p>Have a Great Week!</p>
<p>Scott Voak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voakhomes.com/128/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday Morning Coffee &#8211; What happens when the Fed stops buying Mortgages?</title>
		<link>http://www.voakhomes.com/123</link>
		<comments>http://www.voakhomes.com/123#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Voak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Monday Morning Coffee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Crash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buy a Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.my4sranch.com/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fed is set to stop buying mortgages at the end of March.  Most people who I think have a good idea what is going on think rates will rise .5% to .75% when this happens.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float:right;padding:0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.voakhomes.com/123"></a></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voakhomes.com%2F123"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voakhomes.com%2F123&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p id="top" />
<h1 style="text-align: center;">Monday Morning Coffee</h1>
<h1 style="text-align: center;">What Happens when the Fed stops buying MSBE&#8217;s?</h1>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Januray 17, 2010</h2>
<p>Good morning,</p>
<p>I hope you had a great weekend.  We were very busy as we had 18 friends over for dinner on Friday night and went to the San Diego Association of Realtors Installation Dinner where our friend Mark Marquez was installed as President on Saturday night.  So now, it is a race for bed!</p>
<p>Updated my blog earlier today with a post on what is going to happen when the Fed stops buying MSBEs in March.  The short version is that the market will slow, interest rates will rise and they will step in again to resume purchases, but on a smaller scale with rates up about 1% over the year.  <a href="http://click.icptrack.com/icp/relay.php?r=59254087&amp;msgid=772517&amp;act=UJD1&amp;c=348890&amp;destination=http%3A%2F%2Fvoakhomes.com%2Fscotts-blog.asp">The long version is here. </a></p>
<p>We have a new couple of new homes this week, but due to lingering issues with the office move, I do not have single property sites up for them yet.  Both are short sales:</p>
<p>Palomino Plan 3 in 4S &#8211; 4550sf 6 bedroom home with a 4 car garage on a very large lot.  It is priced at $900k.  We have offers on this and will probably be off the market early in the week.</p>
<p>Canyon Ridge Plan 2 in 4S &#8211; 3600+ sf 4 bedroom home with an loft and an office over the garage.  This is also a large lot and has a pool (but there is an issue with underground water that needs to be dealt with or at least acknowledged).  There are no showings on this until next weekend when we will have an open house (owners are packing).  It is priced at $800k.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it &#8211; I will have single property sites for them next week.</p>
<p>Enjoy the Coffee!</p>
<p><a href="http://click.icptrack.com/icp/relay.php?r=59254087&amp;msgid=772517&amp;act=UJD1&amp;c=348890&amp;destination=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DIUEFA0JYMGo">This week I am revisiting a story I posted last year for an update.</a>  It&#8217;s the one about the autistic basketball player and hits home for Cori and I as Zach&#8217;s Fragile-X puts him on the autistism spectum.  As he is getting older, his issues are becoming more pronounced and we gain more respect every day for both our own son and other families that navigate the world of autism/Fragile-X every day.  He is almost 4, and although I prefer he take up soccer to basketball (due to my own limited skills), any way he can have a moment like this would be worth it.  Videos like this are a great source of hope for parents who have handicapped children.</p>
<p>Have a Great Week!</p>
<p>Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voakhomes.com/123/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prediction for when the Fed stops buying MBSEs</title>
		<link>http://www.voakhomes.com/79</link>
		<comments>http://www.voakhomes.com/79#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 00:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Voak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Crash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.my4sranch.com/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet another market prediction]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float:right;padding:0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.voakhomes.com/79"></a></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voakhomes.com%2F79"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voakhomes.com%2F79&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p id="top" />I was looking at numbers over the last year as they related to sales values to try and figure out what effect that Fed&#8217;s purchases of Mortgage Backed Securities has been.  A major problem it getting accurate numbers is that housing prices are reported as an average or median price.  In markets that are consistent, this is a good method to use.  However, when the market changes (as it has recently) the median price especially becomes less and less meaningful.  Here&#8217;s a quick explanation:</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say there are 10 houses that sell. </p>
<ul>
<li>4 are two bedroom homes that sell for $200k.</li>
<li>2 are four bedroom homes that sell for $400k.</li>
<li>4 are six bedroom homes that sell for $600k. </li>
<li>In this case, your median price is $400k (median is the price of the average home, not the average price of homes). </li>
</ul>
<p> Now, let&#8217;s say the price for each home increases $50,000.  However, due to a factor such as loans being difficult or no inventory being available on 6 bedroom homes, we sell the following homes:</p>
<ul>
<li>4 two bedroom homes for $250k.</li>
<li>2 four bedroom homes for $450k.</li>
<li>1 six bedroom home for $650k.</li>
<li>In this case, your median price is $250k. </li>
</ul>
<p>Here is a simplistic example showing that the median price fell even though the price on every home increased.  It is also the reason why current data on housing prices is to be viewed a little skeptically.  My guess is that the data on median prices is under reporting the gain in housing because the shift has been towards more less expensive homes selling which brings the median down. </p>
<p>So, I looked at my favorite housing micro-economy, 4S Ranch.  Here I can break houses down to similar sizes and ownership (condo vs fee simple) and look at what a slice of homes has done over several years.  In some of the data segments, there are not enough sales to be meaningful,  but in others, there is a large enough sample size to give a relatively clear picture.  A problem does come into play when one segment has several short sales or foreclosures in a quarter as they skew the prices downward.  Going through the home sales for the past year and trying to adjust for foreclosures, etc.  I come to the following conclusions (with reservation as this is not exact by any means and there is a good margin for error):</p>
<ul>
<li>Detached homes priced under $650k were up 5-12% (the 12% is a little shaky due to small sample size).  I would feel fairly comfortable saying these homes are up in general about 7% in the last year.</li>
<li>Homes priced above $800k slumped early in the year, but have made it back to about even. </li>
</ul>
<p>I think a large part of the difference here is the fact that loans are much easier to get in the lower price ranges (in fact, all of the homes I have sold over $800k in the last year have been bought by buyers with large downpayments.  There are almost no loans above $700k to be had).  The only reason that loans below $700k are available at current interest rates is that the Fed has been buying them from the banks to the tune of many BBBBillions of dollars a week.  If this ends as scheduled in March, rates are going to have to rise for the following very simple reason &#8211; we have to entice someone else to buy the loans.  Here&#8217;s a fictional conversation between Bank of America and China:  <em>Remember those BBBBillions of dollars of loans we sold you a couple of years ago?  We know it didn&#8217;t turn out real well for you what with all those defaults and foreclosures.  But&#8230;.how about buying a couple hundred BBBBillion more?</em>  It is not too hard to see that China (or any other buyer of mortgages) is going to want a higher return for taking on the risk.  A higher return for them means higher rates for you and me. </p>
<p>So, if the Fed stops buying mortgages as planned in March, rates will rise rather quickly.  How high and how fast?  Well they have to rise high enough that the rest of the world will buy the loans, but not high enough that people stop buying houses.  Market &#8220;experts&#8221; think rates will rise between .75% and 2%.  If they rise 1.5%, it could take someone who qualifies for a $640k loan down to about a $495k loan.  That would take the wind right out of the housing market.  A buyer who has been looking at a $675k house an imagining the four bedrooms is not going to put the same payment into a three bedroom condo.  They will likely sit on the sidelines and we will see the number of transactions slow dramatically until prices fall enough to put our buyer back into a four bedroom house. </p>
<p>So, do I think prices are neccessarily going to drop 20%?  No.  For the same reason I predicted in August that the Home Buyer Tax Credit would be extended &#8211; politicians are running the show.  I am not an economist, but I have at least a basic understanding of the markets.  However, I think it is fairly easy to predict what is going to happen &#8211; so, here it goes:</p>
<ul>
<li>Rates will start to rise in mid-late February (loans that start in mid February will be completed in mid March and have to be sold in late March, when the Fed is scheduled to stop buying them).</li>
<li>By the end of March it will be pretty clear that rising rates have slowed down the housing market and talk will start fresh about a housing led double-dip recession.</li>
<li>Democrats who control the entire political engine in Washington will very quickly realize that a summer recession with ever increasing unemployment and vacant foreclosed homes will translate into a lot of lost seats in the House of Representatives in the November election.</li>
<li>By mid-April (if not sooner) the Fed will announce that they will resume buying MBSEs although on a smaller scale (this will be an attempt to create a soft landing).</li>
<li>The market will stabilize again although we are not likely to see the same enthusiasm for real estate as we are seeing right now.  This is because the Fed eventually has to get out of buying all the mortgages the banks can write (don&#8217;t they?), and as they do, rates will slowly creep up.</li>
</ul>
<p>Since I am making the prediction, it is sure to not happen, but I think we will end the year with mortgage rates about .75-1% higher than they are today and prices within 3-5% of where they are although they may bounce around a lot before settling down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voakhomes.com/79/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When the Music Stops &#8211; Tax Credit</title>
		<link>http://www.voakhomes.com/77</link>
		<comments>http://www.voakhomes.com/77#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 00:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Voak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Crash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.my4sranch.com/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The effect of the expiring tax credit on the 2010 Real Estate market.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float:right;padding:0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.voakhomes.com/77"></a></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voakhomes.com%2F77"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voakhomes.com%2F77&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p id="top" />Another important component when considering the real estate market for 2010 is the tax credit that runs through the first quarter of next year.  According to the National Association of Realtors, over 40% of home purchases in the third quarter of 2009 were motivated by the tax credit.  The tax credit combined with the artificially low interest rates (see my last post on interest rates) are encouraging people who might otherwise buy in the next two years to buy now.  These buyers have been responsible for the surging demand that has helped the market recover some of its lost ground at the entry level (I am writing generally about California and specifically about San Diego County).</p>
<p>This has been fantastic for a number of reasons:</p>
<ol>
<li>The rising real estate market has helped the emotional state of economy and provided hope that things are getting better &#8211; with that hope, people may spend a little more which will help the economy further.</li>
<li>The rising prices at the low end of the market may allow some people to re-finance their homes when their rates adjust in the next few months as increased prices mean an incease in equity.</li>
<li>The increase in transactions has helped those of us (like yours truly) who sell real estate be able earn an income and not have to get a real job (since my last job as a busboy in high school didn&#8217;t work out so well, this is by far the most important result of the rising market).</li>
</ol>
<p>However, there is a downside.  If buyers who would normally make their first home purchase over the next two years are buying now, who is going to buy in the next two years?  I think that when the tax credit expires, we are going to find that the demand is going to slow down and be lower than expected for one to two years (for a parallel example, look at the car industry which did great with Cash for Clunker when people who might have bought a car over the next year and an incentive to do it earlier &#8211; however the following months have disappointing as the people who would normally be buying now have already purchased).</p>
<p>Will this in and of itself be a disaster?  I don&#8217;t think so.  However, combined with tighter financing and higher interest rates I think that it will be a serious drag on the market.</p>
<p>By now you are saying, &#8220;This guy isn&#8217;t too bright.  He needs to sell houses because he can&#8217;t bus tables and yet he&#8217;s saying the market could be in for a downturn.&#8221;  Well, you&#8217;re right.  But those of you who know me are aware that I am comfortable losing a sale if it means I am honestly letting you know what I think the market is doing.  I lost a lot of buyers in 2005-2007 because I was honest about where I thought the market was going.  That doesn&#8217;t mean you shouldn&#8217;t buy (and for many people who bought in 2005-2007 it was the right move).  I am still saying the same thing now I was then:  If you are buying a home to put down roots and raise a family, you should do so.  If you are buying a home for two years, think carefully.</p>
<p>I think the combination of currently low interest rates and easy financing make it a great time to buy a home.  Just be sure you get yourself in a 30-fixed loan and get the best interest rate you can.  Also, buy a home that will work for 7-10 years.  Although I would love you to buy another in 2 years, that is not a smart plan of action right now.  If you are newly married and planning a family in 2 years, buy a 3 bedroom so you can grow into it.  Maybe you won&#8217;t need to stay in the home for 7 years.  Maybe I&#8217;m wrong and the market will keep shooting up.  Great &#8211; turn it into a rental if that happens.  Think conservatively at this point as the market direction for the next two years is murky at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voakhomes.com/77/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coming Loan Mods and Foreclosures</title>
		<link>http://www.voakhomes.com/66</link>
		<comments>http://www.voakhomes.com/66#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Voak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Crash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.my4sranch.com/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How much of a housing overhang is there?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float:right;padding:0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.voakhomes.com/66"></a></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voakhomes.com%2F66"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.voakhomes.com%2F66&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p id="top" />This is a re-print of a Monday Morning Coffee from 3 weeks ago.  Someone asked me to post it on the blog, so here it is.</p>
<p>I spent a lot of time going through data this week with the goal being to look at all types of mortgages that are currently out there and see what the delinquency rate is and when they are due for interest rate adjustments.  We know from historical data that the following has been true:</p>
<ul>
<li>Once a loan is 60 days late, there is a 98% chance that it will be liquidated through a foreclosure, short sale or a loan modification will take place.</li>
<li>Over the past 2 years, it appears that for every 1 foreclosure or short sale there have been 3 loan modifications.</li>
<li>Within one year, 58% of all loan modification are 90 days late and since the banks do not do 2 loan modifications on the same loan, at least 58% of the 75% delinquents that were modified the first time around will be liquidated within between 12 and 24 months of first going delinquent.</li>
<li>Taking those together, once a loan is 60 days late, about 25% of the homes will be liquidated within a year (that&#8217;s the longest they are generally taking to process) and 44% (58% x 75%) will be liquidated in the second year.  (I could not find data on the second year after loan modification, most likely because there isn&#8217;t enough yet).</li>
<li>This means that the effects of the mortgage defaults are felt over an extended period.</li>
<li>These numbers will likely improve over the next couple of years as the Home Affordable modifications do more to reduce principle and payment that previous modifications.  However, there are many that don&#8217;t think it will make much difference.  The Home Affordable modifications allow for 5 years before the new loan adjusts towards market interest rates.</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<p>With the above track record, I was hoping to look at all loans that are out there and overlay loan types with when they are adjusting and the forecasted foreclosure/modification rates to get an idea how long until we work through the distressed inventory of homes (and who said I&#8217;m not a fun guy to hang out with on a Friday night.)</p>
<p>Unfortunately, I cannot get my hands on all the data.  Those who have it are not giving it up without a lot of dollars and frankly, I think we can get a rough idea with what I did find. </p>
<p>What I found is available on the Federal Reserve Bank of New York&#8217;s Web site (if you want to get really depressed, they have a <a href="http://click.icptrack.com/icp/relay.php?r=59254087&amp;msgid=766451&amp;act=UJD1&amp;c=348890&amp;admin=0&amp;destination=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.newyorkfed.org%2Fcreditconditions%2F">map showing every county in the country with mortgage, auto, credit and student loan delinquencies</a>).  I was able to download the data for Sub-Prime and Alt-A loans as of June 30 of this year.</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="11%" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="11%" valign="top"># of Homes</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">Late in last 12 Mo.</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">Not Currently Late</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">30-59 Days Late</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">60-89 Days Late</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">90 or More Days Late</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">In Foreclosure</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">Bank Owned</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="11%" valign="top"><strong>Calif. </strong></td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">13,308,346</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="11%" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="11%" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="11%" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="11%" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="11%" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="11%" valign="top"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="11%" valign="top">Alt-A</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">613,580</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">46%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">62%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">5%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">3%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">14%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">12%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="11%" valign="top">Sub-Prime</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">326,521</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">68%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">45%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">7%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">5%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">20%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">16%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="11%" valign="top"><strong>U.S. </strong></td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">127.901.934</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="11%" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="11%" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="11%" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="11%" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="11%" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="11%" valign="top"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="11%" valign="top">Alt-A</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">1,996,353</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">40%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">69%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">5%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">3%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">10%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">11%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="11%" valign="top">Sub-Prime</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">2,400,893</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">66%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top"><strong>50% </strong></td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">10%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">6%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">17%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">14%</td>
<td width="11%" valign="top">4%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<p>Quick note &#8211; Alt-A borrowers have better credit scores than Sub-Prime borrowers and typically longer time periods before adjustable loans re-set which is why you see lower delinquencies.  </p>
<p>So, the first wave of foreclosures that started last year was in the sub-prime market and the next (possibly this summer) is the Alt-A market.  But look at the number in bottom that is bolded &#8211; even after the loan mods and foreclosures of the past year 50% of the people in the country with sub-prime loans are delinquent!</p>
<p>I know this is getting long, but a couple more pieces of information on both types of loans, focusing on CA:</p>
<p>Sub-Prime:</p>
<ul>
<li>Of the 326,521 sub-prime loans in existence, about 208,000 are adjustable.</li>
<li>172,359 of those have already re-set (the introductory interest rate is over).</li>
<li>There are only about 36,000 homes left to re-set.</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<p>Alt-A:</p>
<ul>
<li>Of the 613,650 Alt-A loans in existence, about 428,000 are adjustable.</li>
<li>181,898 of those have already re-set.</li>
<li>There are 246,000 homes left to re-set (most of them more than 2 years out)</li>
<li>Because of better credit scores, more Alt-A homeowners were offered negative ammortization loans which will be harder to modify because they have no equity.</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<p>At least in California there is likely to be more damage in the second wave as the Sub-prime loans that were modified the first time default again combined with a larger pool of Alt-A loans that are re-setting over the next 3 years.</p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t think this means a 20% drop in market prices.  I think we are likely to see another drop during 2010 and an extended period of up and down (the Alt-A loans will re-set through the next 3-4 years and then we will have the Home Affordable loans re-setting starting in year 5 which should be a smaller number (if the market stabilizes) but will still be a negative influence). I think we are mostly through the painful devaluation phase and moving into what I can best call (someone else&#8217;s term) an extended &#8220;muddle through&#8221; period.</p>
<p>In summary as I have said before, we have oversold housing as an investment over the past 10 years and undersold it as &#8220;home&#8221;.  We don&#8217;t have a choice anymore but to look at our homes as places we raise our families and with the help of 30 year fixed mortgages, slowly pay off so that our true  &#8220;investments&#8221; don&#8217;t have to pay for our mortgage when we retire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voakhomes.com/66/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
